Islamic radicalization should not be off-limits as a matter of inquiry and debate. Most critics of Peter King's hearing have talked as though mentioning Islam and terrorism in the same sentence is bigotry in its own right--unless you hasten to include references to Oklahoma City, Jared Loughner, and right-wing extremists. This position is absurd, just as King says.

Militant Islam poses a distinctive kind of danger, and we should to be able to talk about it and look into it. This should not even need saying. I also have time for the view that leaders of the Muslim community in the US would be wise to denounce extremism more conspicuously, and be less defensive when the subject comes up (though in this, of course, they are partly at the mercy of the media).

The problem with King's hearing is not the topic of inquiry but, first, the format--congressional hearings are often more about politicians thrusting themselves into the news and parading pre-cooked opinions than discovering new information; this one was a case in point--and, second, its chairman, King himself. This of all subjects demands moderation, dispassion and sensitivity. He was comparatively restrained today, but King is a bombast-merchant. He has said there are "too many mosques" in the US. That remark is an expression of bigotry. According to this profile by Robert Kolker, King has said more than once that extremism has spread to 80 percent of the US Muslim population, which is ridiculous. (He also has shall we say muddled views about terrorism in general. During the Troubles in Northern Ireland he regarded the IRA as freedom-fighters, and called the British government a murder machine.)

Just the kind of calm, judicious congressman you want for a job like this.

Islamic radicalization should not be off-limits as a matter of inquiry and debate. Most critics of Peter King's hearing have talked as though mentioning Islam and terrorism in the same sentence is bigotry in its own right--unless you hasten to include references to Oklahoma City, Jared Loughner, and right-wing extremists. This position is absurd, just as King says.

Militant Islam poses a distinctive kind of danger, and we should to be able to talk about it and look into it. This should not even need saying. I also have time for the view that leaders of the Muslim community in the US would be wise to denounce extremism more conspicuously, and be less defensive when the subject comes up (though in this, of course, they are partly at the mercy of the media).

The problem with King's hearing is not the topic of inquiry but, first, the format--congressional hearings are often more about politicians thrusting themselves into the news and parading pre-cooked opinions than discovering new information; this one was a case in point--and, second, its chairman, King himself. This of all subjects demands moderation, dispassion and sensitivity. He was comparatively restrained today, but King is a bombast-merchant. He has said there are "too many mosques" in the US. That remark is an expression of bigotry. According to this profile by Robert Kolker, King has said more than once that extremism has spread to 80 percent of the US Muslim population, which is ridiculous. (He also has shall we say muddled views about terrorism in general. During the Troubles in Northern Ireland he regarded the IRA as freedom-fighters, and called the British government a murder machine.)

Just the kind of calm, judicious congressman you want for a job like this.

Peter Graves, who died on Sunday at age 83, is being remembered this morning primarily for two achievements: Being the star of Mission: Impossible and being a good sport spoofing himself in the Airplane! movies. But his story is more interesting than that.
Yes, Graves was the right actor at the right time to lead the motley crew of operatives on Mission: Impossible, a James Bond-era adventure series that aired at a time when such dramas could be presented without irony. Although not without flecks of light humor (mostly from the sparks provided by the slinky twosome Martin Landau and Babara Bain), M:I was even able to pull off the “Your mission, should you choose to accept it” shtick with a straight face because Graves was, well, a gravely serious leader as Jim Phelps, leader of a secret government organization.
When M:I first aired on CBS between 1967 and 1973, it was still possible to present impossible missions seriously right alongside parodies of exactly the same sort of show — Mel Brooks’ Get Smart! coexisted on NBC at the same time.
Before Mission: Impossible, though, Graves had led an uneven, bumpy career. He’d come to Hollywood in the shadow of his more-famous brother, James Arness, who became an even bigger TV legend as the star of Gunsmoke, the most popular and longest-running Western of its era. Graves even changed his last name (it was his maternal grandfather’s name) to distinguish himself from his brother.
Not that they didn’t work in the same genre sometimes. Graves headed up a early-’60s Western, Whiplash, which was both typical of the era — check out the stagecoach and the Frankie Laine-style theme song — and distinctive
Graves had a feature-film career, and while he never attained A-list leading-man status, his resume included notable appearances in good movies such as Charles Laughton’s Night of the Hunter (1955) and Otto Preminger’s The Court-Martial of Billy Mitchell (1955), he struggled to rise above the kind of low-budget junk that would become fodder for ridicule on Mystery Science Theater 3000, movies such as Killers from Space and It Conquered the World.
The final phase of Graves’ career was one he entered into unwillingly at first. The story has often been told that when he was sent the script for the first Airplane! movie, he didn’t want to do it, thought it was in bad taste, didn’t get that it was more of an affectionate send-up of his granite-hard delivery than an outright humilation of it.
Once Airplane! became a hit, though, Graves had pulled off one of the best Hollywood tricks: Instead of being an object of ridicule for his bad B-movies, he was now in on the joke, and celebrated as a guy who could not just take a joke but deliver one with fine deadpan timing.
Which led to his stint as host of A&E’s Biography, a series that became known in part for the sound of his deep, grainy voice. He’d come full circle, and was the subject of a Biography episode himself in 1997.
Peter Graves’ career stands as an example of the way a smart, dexterous actor can survive decades of tough Hollywood life and emerge looking as he did in his prime: smooth, cool, and dashing, making it all look easy. It wasn’t, which makes his work all the more impressive.

Peter Graves, who died on Sunday at age 83, is being remembered this morning primarily for two achievements: Being the star of Mission: Impossible and being a good sport spoofing himself in the Airplane! movies. But his story is more interesting than that.
Yes, Graves was the right actor at the right time to lead the motley crew of operatives on Mission: Impossible, a James Bond-era adventure series that aired at a time when such dramas could be presented without irony. Although not without flecks of light humor (mostly from the sparks provided by the slinky twosome Martin Landau and Babara Bain), M:I was even able to pull off the “Your mission, should you choose to accept it” shtick with a straight face because Graves was, well, a gravely serious leader as Jim Phelps, leader of a secret government organization.
When M:I first aired on CBS between 1967 and 1973, it was still possible to present impossible missions seriously right alongside parodies of exactly the same sort of show — Mel Brooks’ Get Smart! coexisted on NBC at the same time.
Before Mission: Impossible, though, Graves had led an uneven, bumpy career. He’d come to Hollywood in the shadow of his more-famous brother, James Arness, who became an even bigger TV legend as the star of Gunsmoke, the most popular and longest-running Western of its era. Graves even changed his last name (it was his maternal grandfather’s name) to distinguish himself from his brother.
Not that they didn’t work in the same genre sometimes. Graves headed up a early-’60s Western, Whiplash, which was both typical of the era — check out the stagecoach and the Frankie Laine-style theme song — and distinctive
Graves had a feature-film career, and while he never attained A-list leading-man status, his resume included notable appearances in good movies such as Charles Laughton’s Night of the Hunter (1955) and Otto Preminger’s The Court-Martial of Billy Mitchell (1955), he struggled to rise above the kind of low-budget junk that would become fodder for ridicule on Mystery Science Theater 3000, movies such as Killers from Space and It Conquered the World.
The final phase of Graves’ career was one he entered into unwillingly at first. The story has often been told that when he was sent the script for the first Airplane! movie, he didn’t want to do it, thought it was in bad taste, didn’t get that it was more of an affectionate send-up of his granite-hard delivery than an outright humilation of it.
Once Airplane! became a hit, though, Graves had pulled off one of the best Hollywood tricks: Instead of being an object of ridicule for his bad B-movies, he was now in on the joke, and celebrated as a guy who could not just take a joke but deliver one with fine deadpan timing.
Which led to his stint as host of A&E’s Biography, a series that became known in part for the sound of his deep, grainy voice. He’d come full circle, and was the subject of a Biography episode himself in 1997.
Peter Graves’ career stands as an example of the way a smart, dexterous actor can survive decades of tough Hollywood life and emerge looking as he did in his prime: smooth, cool, and dashing, making it all look easy. It wasn’t, which makes his work all the more impressive.

Lent, a time when many of us give up and sacrifice many things that we enjoy. So why haven't we seen any celebrities give up their bad habits during lent? The stars sure do have a lot of annoying and bad habits. Maybe Lady Ga Ga could give up those insane outfits for a week. Or maybe Jersey Shore could ease up on the "fist pumping" for a few days? Hey, maybe Tiger Woods could give up women for a week?

What do you think celebrities should give up for lent?

Lent, a time when many of us give up and sacrifice many things that we enjoy. So why haven't we seen any celebrities give up their bad habits during lent? The stars sure do have a lot of annoying and bad habits. Maybe Lady Ga Ga could give up those insane outfits for a week. Or maybe Jersey Shore could ease up on the "fist pumping" for a few days? Hey, maybe Tiger Woods could give up women for a week?

What do you think celebrities should give up for lent?

Peter King Defends His Attack On Michael Jackson and Media

Peter King Defends His Attack On Michael Jackson and Media